Type something to search...
Historical Trading Performance - Closed Positions Analysis

Historical Trading Performance - Closed Positions Analysis

πŸ“Š Performance Summary

Overall Results

  • Total Closed Trades: 15 completed signals
  • Win Rate: 53.33% (8 wins, 7 losses)
  • Total Return: +8.59% on closed positions
  • Average Trade Duration: 26.8 days
  • Primary Strategy: SMA-based signals with emerging EMA validation

Key Performance Metrics

  • Best Trade: TSLA +16.58% (41 days)
  • Worst Trade: UHS -15.02% (19 days)
  • Longest Hold: VTR 71 days (-8.11%)
  • Shortest Hold: COIN 0 days (-0.59%)

Risk-Reward Profile

  • Profit Factor: 1.21 (modest profitability)
  • Average Winner: +6.09%
  • Average Loser: -5.73%
  • Win Rate Required for Breakeven: 48.5%
  • Actual Win Rate: 53.33% βœ…

πŸ† Top Performing Completed Trades

πŸ₯‡ TSLA - +16.58%

  • Strategy: SMA 15-23 crossover
  • Entry: 2025-05-01 @ $280.01
  • Exit: 2025-06-11 @ $326.43
  • Duration: 41 days
  • Quality Rating: Excellent
  • Analysis: Excellent momentum capture

πŸ₯ˆ LYV - +10.88%

  • Strategy: SMA 18-29 crossover
  • Entry: 2025-04-14 @ $131.31
  • Exit: 2025-06-17 @ $145.59
  • Duration: 64 days
  • Quality Rating: Good
  • Analysis: Strong performance with good execution

πŸ₯‰ SHOP - +7.41%

  • Strategy: SMA 57-59 crossover
  • Entry: 2025-06-02 @ $106.25
  • Exit: 2025-06-11 @ $114.13
  • Duration: 9 days
  • Quality Rating: Excellent
  • Analysis: Excellent momentum capture

πŸ“ˆ Complete Trade History

RankTickerStrategyEntry DateExit DateReturnDurationQuality
1TSLASMA 15-232025-05-012025-06-11+16.58%41dExcellent
2LYVSMA 18-292025-04-142025-06-17+10.88%64dGood
3SHOPSMA 57-592025-06-022025-06-11+7.41%9dExcellent
4EQTSMA 42-542025-05-052025-05-29+6.90%24dExcellent
5MCOSMA 71-822025-04-292025-05-01+2.84%2dExcellent
6ISRGSMA 83-852025-05-022025-05-07+1.79%5dExcellent
7GMESMA 53-542025-05-132025-06-11+1.78%29dPoor
8LINSMA 68-862025-04-012025-06-02+0.56%62dPoor
9COINSMA 12-132025-06-042025-06-04-0.59%0dPoor
10HSYSMA 78-852025-05-072025-06-17-0.68%41dPoor
11MASMA 8-582025-04-022025-04-03-2.27%1dFailed to Capture Upside
12AAPLSMA 13-372025-05-142025-06-04-4.52%21dPoor Setup - High Risk, Low Reward
13VTRSMA 79-812025-04-012025-06-11-8.11%71dFailed to Capture Upside
14TSLASMA 11-252025-04-032025-04-16-8.95%13dFailed to Capture Upside
15UHSSMA 16-252025-04-022025-04-21-15.02%19dFailed to Capture Upside

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

Win Rate Breakdown

  • Winning Trades: 8 of 15 (53.33%)
  • Average Winner: +6.09%
  • Largest Winner: +16.58%
  • Average Hold (Winners): 29.5 days

Loss Analysis

  • Losing Trades: 7 of 15 (46.67%)
  • Average Loser: -5.73%
  • Largest Loss: -15.02%
  • Average Hold (Losers): 23.7 days

πŸ“Š Quality Distribution Analysis

Poor (4 trades - 26.7%)

  • Win Rate: 50.0%
  • Average Return: +0.27%
  • Total Contribution: +1.07% to overall performance
  • Characteristics: Mixed performance

Failed to Capture Upside (4 trades - 26.7%)

  • Win Rate: 0.0%
  • Average Return: -8.59%
  • Total Contribution: -34.35% to overall performance
  • Characteristics: Requires improvement

Good (1 trades - 6.7%)

  • Win Rate: 100.0%
  • Average Return: +10.88%
  • Total Contribution: +10.88% to overall performance
  • Characteristics: Consistent profitability

Excellent (5 trades - 33.3%)

  • Win Rate: 100.0%
  • Average Return: +7.10%
  • Total Contribution: +35.52% to overall performance
  • Characteristics: Consistent profitability

Poor Setup - High Risk, Low Reward (1 trades - 6.7%)

  • Win Rate: 0.0%
  • Average Return: -4.52%
  • Total Contribution: -4.52% to overall performance
  • Characteristics: Requires improvement

πŸ“… Temporal Analysis

Duration Analysis

  • Short-Term Trades (≀7 days): 4 trades, 50.0% win rate
  • Medium-Term Trades (8-30 days): 6 trades, 50.0% win rate
  • Long-Term Trades (>30 days): 5 trades, 60.0% win rate

Strategy Performance

SMA Strategy

  • Trades: 15 completed
  • Win Rate: 53.33%
  • Average Return: +0.57% per trade
  • Total Contribution: +8.59%
  • Average Duration: 26.8 days

🎯 Key Learnings from Closed Positions

What Worked

  1. Quality signal execution: Excellent and Good trades showing consistent profitability
  2. Strategy diversification: Multiple timeframes providing varied opportunities
  3. Risk management: Controlled losses when trades don’t work out

What Failed

  1. Signal quality consistency: Too many poor setups executed reducing overall performance
  2. Exit timing optimization: Average exit efficiency of -0.91 indicates significant room for improvement
  3. Duration management: Mixed results across timeframes requiring optimization

Critical Insights

  1. Quality over quantity: Focus on excellent signals shows best results (100% win rate for excellent trades)
  2. Exit optimization critical: Poor exit efficiency destroying potential returns
  3. Strategy validation essential: System shows positive edge requiring systematic optimization

πŸ“‹ Conclusion

The historical performance of 15 closed trades reveals a profitable system with clear optimization pathways. The 53.3% win rate and 1.21 profit factor indicate positive edge with room for enhancement.

Key Takeaways:

  • Signal quality is paramount: Focus on excellent signals shows best results (100% win rate for excellent trades)
  • Exit optimization critical: Average exit efficiency of -0.91 represents major improvement opportunity
  • Strategy development: Single strategy focus needs diversification with EMA validation
  • Risk management: Controlled risk profile with positive expectation requiring refinement

This historical analysis provides foundation for systematic improvements to signal generation and execution. The patterns identified here guide optimization of the complete trading system.

Related Posts